We have been motivated/convinced to hate the State of a nation for decades. Ask yourself what were, in broad terms and according to those who wrote History, the scapegoats that would have caused the two previous world wars and what were the main results : [political] Anarchy for the first war and nationalisms for the second that was called the "Funny war"; with the result of the "League of Nations" at the end of the First World War - which will not have lasted long - and the UN at the end of the Second World War which still exists.
Small incidental detail that could also be added to the consequences of these two wars : hundreds of millions of deaths.
Even today, we are told the same refrain : "Nationalisms are reborn from their ashes !", "Beware of the dark moments of History" etc... with the slight difference in the fact that we are told that today : "it's all over the world".
For some, the little help to reject the idea of a national State is not necessary : they can't stand a centralized entity telling them how to breathe in their own locality.
For others, the national State is fundamental to organizing and preserving a society.
For a tiny minority, the State no longer has any meaning. It is even a factor of economic and technological slowdown.
The first and third groups seem to agree on the problem but for different reasons and above all, for radically opposite objectives : the former want a totally local autonomous organization without being subjected to a central Power that is far away and that does not understand their culture, nor their philosophy of life, nor the environment in which they live; while the third dream of a global supranational organization (a world State), where the "management" of peoples would be done more simply, quickly and more effectively (especially with current technologies which, according to them, can replace [finally] this workforce too complex to manage and which in addition, asks them for more and more freedom).
The third world war will be, if there is a third world war, a mixture of civil wars and wars between nations. You will eventually be convinced to kill other people you do not know and whom you do not hate, when you'll live the death of your loved ones. After the massacre that will occur, the few people who will remain will naturally ask or accept, after suffering an unspeakable psychological and emotional fatigue, the outstretched hand of those who will have knowingly caused the horror.
Because you really think that these people who "manage" our lives and our future are incompetent and incapable ? Nah ... they have been "incompetent" for decades while we are told visually and soundly that they come out of Ivy leagues and tuti quanti.
Enough : we no longer want to bet on people whose multi-decade-year expertise has only - let's repeat -, "has only" rot our lives.
We want to live. Live moments with the people we love, live our curiosity in the face of reality etc ...
What do we care about internal wars between those who rule their respective countries according to their individual interests ? Let them do it in a ring, on an island, in an Octagon, let them mall each other ! But we, simple living beings, want to live without pollution coming from a minority of fanatics who are afraid of life itself.
We are told about "progress", "technological innovations" that can, among other things, allow us to take flying taxis, for example. But what do we care about your flying taxis ? I have something that costs much less, that is more satisfying right now, that will not pollute the environment and that is also flying : a slap.
It is time to give [really] the voice to the people : what does the majority want. It is the structure by which this voice, which is supposedly carried, must be changed.
Referendums decided by the people and without limits (the Blockchain can allow it because : everyone could use it; is totally transparent, incorruptible and decentralized since no intermediary is necessary for its proper functioning
1.
From there, it will be up to a majority to decide the points they want to discuss without daily attempts to bombard them with perverse and contrary arguments.
But don't get me wrong, this little comfort that we all have, reading these few lines warmly, will be taken away from you like a vulgar dream and you will be reminded that you are the property of a minority of fanatics who will have decided to use you as a cannon pulpit against other fanatics of the same kind so that they do not "steal" their interests when they establish their global State.
The coming days, weeks and months will be a mixture of ultra-aggressive propaganda, political decisions much more restrictive than those we experienced for 2-3 years during this Covid and which had no place to be. We will also close our eyes to dramatic events that we could have avoided to try to convince us to go to war.
I very much hope that these lines are bullshit and that they come from a frustrated and not lucid mind.
To be continued ...
Written on November 27, 2024
----
- Related article #1 : "Yes to war !" ? #1
- Related article #2 : "Yes to war !" ? #2
- Related article #3 : All Lafodas >
“Good cop, bad cop”, or how to sell the Plague when you already have Cholera
1. A blockchain is a distributed ledger with growing lists of records (blocks) that are securely linked together ...
